I’ve had a week to reflect on my bike ride across the USA following the Yellowstone Trail. I’m glad I took up the adventure, it was a great experience. It was challenging, but not as difficult as I thought it would be. It was easier than hiking the Appalachian Trail. Starting out slow with only 30 miles a day for the first week, and then building up by 10 miles a day each week helped my body prepare along the way for the challenge. Those early miles were some of the toughest when I went over the Rockies in eastern Washington, Idaho, and western Montana.
While it would be fun to bike across the USA on any route, following the Yellowstone Trail added another element of interest in the journey, and I learned a lot about its history, and history of the regions along the route. And following the Yellowstone Trail provided an opportunity to meet some wonderful people along the way that I otherwise would not have met. Not only did the YT make my ride more interesting, but it also made it more challenging as I was spending a lot of time on undeveloped roads and gravel roads.
There are a lot of people I need to thank for their support along the way; helping with navigating, providing help along the way, and even riding some miles with me. I appreciate your interest in following my adventure. Having an opportunity to share it with you made it more meaningful to me.
Two mysteries developed along the way that went unresolved, but I think I have some good answers. The first was the red circle in a white square painted on the walls of the hotel in Waterville, WA and again in Coeur d’Alene, ID. Dave King suggested that it may have been a sign used by the railroads as a seal of approval, that those hotels were approved for business by the railroad. The second mystery was the “Ka Plunk” sound that woke me when I camped next to a pond at Warm Springs, MT. Dale Sexton reported that the “Ka Plunk” sounds were beaver tails hitting the water. That makes sense to me.
While biking I thought a lot about the differences between hiking and biking. An obvious difference was mountain peaks. When I saw them on the Appalachian Trail, I knew the trail was heading up and over them. The point of the Appalachian Trail was to link the mountain peaks of the Appalachian Mountains. However, in biking, I knew the trail would go through a pass between the mountain peaks. It was tough enough biking over the pass, at least I did not have to bike over the peaks. Another difference is that when going downhill on a bike, I could coast. When hiking, I would still have to hike down, and some steep downhills were tougher than the uphills.
During my bike ride, I met more people; but during my hike, I met people more. My encounters with people along the Yellowstone Trail were usually a matter of minutes; hiking the AT, I spent weeks on and off with some people.
You can eat a lot more while biking versus hiking. Hiking the AT, most days you can only eat what you are carrying; you come to a town only every four or five days. Biking, I was going through a town almost every day. I’m going to miss my afternoon root beer floats.
My Trek 520 performed very well for me. In the 3,657 miles, I put it through a lot with off road riding on dirt trails, through fields even, and a lot of gravel. I went through three pairs of tires, two chains, two sets of brake pads, and a pair of pedals. The bike is now back in Jackson, Michigan being restored to like new condition.
My cross country bike journey was a wonderful way to spend 65 days, and a great way to see the country and meet interesting people. I recommend you get out and try it, not necessarily across the country; but a small trip across the state, or even the county.
Happy Trails,
Jim








